The United States has been the world leader in information technology for decades. As a result of this, innovation and technological advancements have significantly shaped not only its economy but society as well.
The effects are reaching their end with America’s dominance being challenged by emerging economies such as China and India which offer better opportunities for tech-savvy individuals to thrive than what is available in Western countries at the moment .
However, these potential threats don’t seem to be stopping US companies from continuing on their path of dominating globalization. Americans are still becoming more dominant across industries every day despite competition from other nations. The question now is how long will it take before they become overwhelmed by an onslaught of new innovations?
technology that does little else than allow people around the globe access to high speed internet service
Would is a verb that means to express interest in something. It can be used with an infinitive phrase, such as “would like” or “would love”.
Is it possible to combine art and science in the same classroom?
Blurring the distinction
They do, according to Anne Willieme, creator of ArtMed insight. She’s teaching aspiring physicians how to watch and see more in a sketching class at the Metropolitan Museum of Art right now.
Participants in Willieme’s seminars improved their ability to reflect statistically significantly, according to a 2018 research published in Academic Medicine.
Separating art from science, according to Katie Grogan, associate director of NYU’s Master Scholars Program in Humanistic Medicine, is “artificial” and even “hazardous.” (She didn’t explain why.)
However, I can see a problem if the border between art and science blurs, causing damage to both professions. I’m thinking of situations when art commentators play physicians and diagnose artworks as if they were their patients.
Dr. Kenneth D. Keele declared Mona pregnant in the Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences, Vol. XIV, published in April 1959.
He made his diagnosis based on the thickness of her neck, where he saw an enlarged thyroid gland, which enlarges somewhat during pregnancy. Her grin, according to Dr. Keele, was also an indication of maternal calm. The case is now closed.
a second viewpoint
Mona Lisa’s grin isn’t truly in the artwork, according to Harvard Medical School neurologist Margaret Livingston, who told the New York Times in 2000.
It’s all a figment of our imagination.
We only assume Mona Lisa is smiling because of the way our eyes and brains calculate light and dark, according to Dr. Livingston.
When we look at the artwork with our peripheral vision, we can see shadows from the cheeks. According to Dr. Livingston, this is what provides the sense that Mona is smiling. However, if you stare at her lips straight, you won’t see the expression.
On Eunomia, you may discuss this news.
Both scientists’ ideas are supported by evidence. Is this, however, how reasonable and objective art evaluation works?
Then there’s physicist Haroldo Ribeiro’s article published in the 2019 issue of Scientific American, which claims that the pixels in great paintings might disclose the mechanics of their brilliance.
Dr. Ribeiro created a computer software that deconstructs paintings into statistics in order to identify tendencies in a painter’s stylistic progression. He believes that digitizing artworks will benefit art historians in detecting previously undiscovered patterns.
Individual emotions to an artwork are lost as a result of such digitisation. Looking at pixels will not transport you to the personal realm of art perception.
But wait, there’s a flip side to making physicians art-savvy: the risk of turning art specialists become diagnosticians.
Mona Lisa was diagnosed with syphilis in 2017 by Guardian art critic Jonathan Jones. He claims that’s why her grin isn’t bigger. She’s concerned about her imminent demise.
Jones got the idea from a convent record in Florence that said she bought snail water, which was the recognized cure for the condition at the time.
Jones remarked that “pools of black shadows spread over del Giocondo’s face,” indicating her anguish about her sickness, to back up his diagnosis.
Look, I’m a big believer in science. It helped us get the immunizations we needed to stop the Coronavirus from spreading. However, it is incapable of assisting us in comprehending art. This is just too intimate to be codified.
Art critics must stop acting as physicians, and doctors must stop acting as art critics.
DISCLAIMER: ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED
Would you like to know more about the “would” command? Visit our blog. Reference: would you.
Frequently Asked Questions
Where is would used?
A: You would use it inside your own home.
What is a better word for would?
A: Would is a verb.
What does would do mean?
A: Would do is a contraction of the phrase, would you. It can also be used as an alternative to saying, what would happen if I did this?
- would in hindi
- would alice in chains
- how to pronounce would
- we would
- would synonym